Mr. Chambers Yang Had an Interview with Journalist of IT-Times on the Copyright Infringement of Baidu Wenku and the Alleged Monopoly of Baidu

文章摘要 Does it constitute a copyright infringement of Baidu Wenku for sharing literature works for free without obtaining consent of the writers? Can Baidu be exempted from liabilities for the reason that the documents are uploaded by internet users? The above issues have become most debated topics recentl

Does it constitute a copyright infringement of Baidu Wenku for sharing literature works for free without obtaining consent of the writers? Can Baidu be exempted from liabilities for the reason that the documents are uploaded by internet users? The above issues have become most debated topics recently. Under such circumstances, journalist of IT-Times had an interview with Senior Lawyer Mr. Chambers Yang. In Mr. Yang’s opinion, Baidu obviously infringed the right to network dissemination of information of writers and caused certain amount of property losses of such writers. Meanwhile, some non literature works, which have not attracted public attention, have also been shared on Baidu Wenku. As an internet company with wide influence inChina’s IT industry, Baidu should have realized that an infringement on writers’ right to network dissemination ofinformation would be caused by opening the uploading platform of Baidu Wenku to all internet users. Obviously, Baidu cannot be exempted from its liability for infringement by abusing the “SafeHarbor”principles.

 

Also, the journalist of IT Times had an interview with Mr. Yang on the case of Hudong.com (“Hudong”) against Baidu, in which Hudong claims that Baidu takes advantage of its dominant position by manually modifying the search results and placing Baidu Baike at a higher rank than Hudong, which violates the Anti-Monopoly Law of China and constitutes an unfair competition. Mr. Yang considers that supporting evidences are needed to prove the dominant position of Baidu and its dominant position has been abused. However, by advancing the ranking auction above the search results, Baidu has obviously infringed the rights of search engine users and other internet services providers. If Hudong is able to prove Baidu’s abuse of dominant position, it will be helpful to the internet environment. However, the legitimacy of splitting Baidu Corporation still needs to be directly supported by laws and regulations.

最后更新:2019年9月13日

杨春宝一级律师简介

杨春宝一级律师,大成上海高级合伙人、资本市场部主任、国资基金研究中心主任,大成中国区私募基金专业带头人、科技与文化法律研究中心联合牵头人。执业30余年,长期从事私募基金、投融资、并购重组法律服务,尤其对对赌研究颇深且具有非常丰富的实战经验,并专注于金融机构股权投资业务。2004年起多次入选The Legal 500"私募基金"和"公司与商业"等境内外各类律师榜单,代理的中国法院首例适用外国法律审理外国公司的董事损害小股东权益纠纷案入选上海高院发布的《上海法院域外法查明典型案例》和威科先行"要案头条"。具有上市公司独立董事任职资格,系多家知名高校的兼职教授或兼职研究生导师及上海市商务委跨国经营人才培训班讲师。出版《私募股权投资基金风险防控操作实务》等16本投融资法律专著。了解更多

常见法律问题

百度文库未经作者同意免费分享其作品,是否构成侵权?

构成侵权。根据《著作权法》第10条,作者享有信息网络传播权,即以有线或无线方式向公众提供作品,使公众可在其选定的时间和地点获得作品的权利。百度文库未经许可向公众提供他人作品,直接侵犯了该权利。即使作品由用户上传,百度作为平台运营者,若未采取合理措施防止侵权,亦需承担相应责任。

百度能否以“文档由用户上传”为由,依据“安全港原则”免除侵权责任?

不能。根据《信息网络传播权保护条例》第22条,网络服务提供者适用“避风港”原则需满足多项条件,包括:未改变作品、不知道侵权、未直接获得经济利益、接到通知后及时删除等。但百度文库开放平台供所有用户上传,且百度作为具有广泛影响力的互联网公司,应当预见大量侵权作品被上传,其未采取有效过滤措施,不符合“不知道”的免责条件,不能滥用安全港原则免除责任。

百度在搜索结果中推行竞价排名,是否构成不正当竞争?

可能构成。根据《反不正当竞争法》第12条,经营者不得利用技术手段,通过影响用户选择或其他方式,实施妨碍、破坏其他经营者合法提供的网络服务正常运行的行为。百度在搜索结果上方单独展示竞价排名结果,可能误导用户,损害其他搜索引擎服务提供者及用户的合法权益,属于不正当竞争行为。但具体认定需结合证据判断是否具有主观恶意及实际损害后果。

互动百科指控百度滥用市场支配地位,需要证明哪些要素?

根据《反垄断法》第17条,滥用市场支配地位须满足:1)相关市场界定(如搜索引擎市场);2)百度在该市场具有支配地位(如市场份额、控制能力等);3)百度实施了滥用行为,如将百度百科排名高于互动百科、拒绝交易、附加不合理条件等;4)行为产生了排除、限制竞争的后果。互动百科需提供充分证据,如市场占有率数据、用户依赖程度、技术手段分析等,举证难度较大。

以上内容仅供参考,不构成法律意见。如需专业法律服务,请联系杨春宝一级律师:chambers.yang@dentons.cn

  • 本站声明:本站所载之法律论文、法律评论、案例、法律咨询等,除非另有注明,著作权人均为站长杨春宝高级律师本人。欢迎其他网站链接,但是,未经书面许可,不得擅自摘编、转载。引用及经许可转载时均应注明作者和出处"法律桥",并链接本站。本站网址:http://www.LawBridge.org。
  •  
  •         本站所有内容(包括法律咨询、法律法规)仅供参考,不构成法律意见,本站不对资料的完整性和时效性负责。您在处理具体法律事务时,请洽询有资质的律师。本站将努力为广大网友提供更好的服务,但不对本站提供的任何免费服务作出正式的承诺。本站所载投稿文章,其言论不代表本站观点,如需使用,请与原作者联系,版权归原作者所有。

发表回复