Does it constitute a copyright infringement of Baidu Wenku for sharing literature works for free without obtaining consent of the writers? Can Baidu be exempted from liabilities for the reason that the documents are uploaded by internet users? The above issues have become most debated topics recently. Under such circumstances, journalist of IT-Times had an interview with Senior Lawyer Mr. Chambers Yang. In Mr. Yang’s opinion, Baidu obviously infringed the right to network dissemination of information of writers and caused certain amount of property losses of such writers. Meanwhile, some non literature works, which have not attracted public attention, have also been shared on Baidu Wenku. As an internet company with wide influence inChina’s IT industry, Baidu should have realized that an infringement on writers’ right to network dissemination ofinformation would be caused by opening the uploading platform of Baidu Wenku to all internet users. Obviously, Baidu cannot be exempted from its liability for infringement by abusing the “SafeHarbor”principles.
Also, the journalist of IT Times had an interview with Mr. Yang on the case of Hudong.com (“Hudong”) against Baidu, in which Hudong claims that Baidu takes advantage of its dominant position by manually modifying the search results and placing Baidu Baike at a higher rank than Hudong, which violates the Anti-Monopoly Law of China and constitutes an unfair competition. Mr. Yang considers that supporting evidences are needed to prove the dominant position of Baidu and its dominant position has been abused. However, by advancing the ranking auction above the search results, Baidu has obviously infringed the rights of search engine users and other internet services providers. If Hudong is able to prove Baidu’s abuse of dominant position, it will be helpful to the internet environment. However, the legitimacy of splitting Baidu Corporation still needs to be directly supported by laws and regulations.
杨春宝一级律师简介
常见法律问题
百度文库未经作者同意免费分享其作品,是否构成侵权?
构成侵权。根据《著作权法》第10条,作者享有信息网络传播权,即以有线或无线方式向公众提供作品,使公众可在其选定的时间和地点获得作品的权利。百度文库未经许可向公众提供他人作品,直接侵犯了该权利。即使作品由用户上传,百度作为平台运营者,若未采取合理措施防止侵权,亦需承担相应责任。
百度能否以“文档由用户上传”为由,依据“安全港原则”免除侵权责任?
不能。根据《信息网络传播权保护条例》第22条,网络服务提供者适用“避风港”原则需满足多项条件,包括:未改变作品、不知道侵权、未直接获得经济利益、接到通知后及时删除等。但百度文库开放平台供所有用户上传,且百度作为具有广泛影响力的互联网公司,应当预见大量侵权作品被上传,其未采取有效过滤措施,不符合“不知道”的免责条件,不能滥用安全港原则免除责任。
百度在搜索结果中推行竞价排名,是否构成不正当竞争?
可能构成。根据《反不正当竞争法》第12条,经营者不得利用技术手段,通过影响用户选择或其他方式,实施妨碍、破坏其他经营者合法提供的网络服务正常运行的行为。百度在搜索结果上方单独展示竞价排名结果,可能误导用户,损害其他搜索引擎服务提供者及用户的合法权益,属于不正当竞争行为。但具体认定需结合证据判断是否具有主观恶意及实际损害后果。
互动百科指控百度滥用市场支配地位,需要证明哪些要素?
根据《反垄断法》第17条,滥用市场支配地位须满足:1)相关市场界定(如搜索引擎市场);2)百度在该市场具有支配地位(如市场份额、控制能力等);3)百度实施了滥用行为,如将百度百科排名高于互动百科、拒绝交易、附加不合理条件等;4)行为产生了排除、限制竞争的后果。互动百科需提供充分证据,如市场占有率数据、用户依赖程度、技术手段分析等,举证难度较大。
以上内容仅供参考,不构成法律意见。如需专业法律服务,请联系杨春宝一级律师:chambers.yang@dentons.cn


