Arbitration case on Dispute of Equity Transfer: Dispute on Payment of Equity Transfer Price between One Italian company and One Zhenjiang company

文章摘要 本案涉及一家意大利公司向一家镇江公司转让中国合资企业股权,双方约定分期付款,最后一笔款项以意大利公司在一定期限内向美国及加拿大商标注册机构提交商标转让申请并获得接受为条件。意大利公司向世界知识产权组织(WIPO)提交了申请且被接受,但美国专利商标局确认转让效力的通知晚于约定时间。镇江公司据此认为意大利公司违约,拒绝支付尾款。意大利公司委托杨氏法律团队向中国国际经济贸易仲裁委员会提起仲裁,主张其已履行合同义务。法律团队通过研究《马德里协定》及美国商标审查程序,论证WIPO接受申请即视为美国机构接受,并反驳了镇江公司观点,最终仲裁庭支持了意大利公司的主张。

One Italian company transferred its equity of one Chinese joint venture to one Zhenjiang company and the parties agree to the installment payment term.  The final payment shall be made upon the satisfaction of such requirement that the trademark registration organizations in America and Canada accept the transfer of one registered trademark from the Italian company to the Zhenjiang company within agreed time limit.  The Italian company submitted the transfer application to WIPO which was accepted within the agreed time limit while the time of the notice issued by US Patent and Trademark Office to confirm the effectiveness of the transfer of the trademark is later than the agreed time limit under the equity transfer agreement.  Therefore, the Zhenjiang company considered that the Italian company had breached the contract and refused to pay the final payment in accordance with the equity transfer agreement.  The Italian company considered that it had performed its contract obligations and entrusted legal team of Chambers Yang to raise arbitration toward CIETAC to claim the final payment of equity transfer against the Zhenjiang company.

Upon acceptance of this case, in order to clearly explain to arbitration court that the application of trademark transfer to WIPO is fully in conformity with the equity transfer agreement, legal team of Chambers Yang has not only conducted researches on relevant regulations of registration and transfer of international registered trademark under International Registration of Marks Madrid Protocol, but has also conducted researches on the procedural provisions of transfer of international registered trademark under Trademark manual inspection procedures of US Patent and Trademark Office, and has made “time axis”.  Based on these, legal team of Chambers Yang has comprehensively analyzed that the acceptance of trademark transfer application by WIPO shall be deemed the acceptance of trademark transfer application by US Patent and Trademark Office agreed under the equity transfer agreement.  Meanwhile, legal team of Chambers Yang has refuted the opinion of the Zhenjiang company through logical analysis on the relevant terms of the aforesaid regulations of WIPO and US Patent and Trademark Office.  And, our views have been fully supported by the arbitration court finally.

最后编辑于:2018-09-23 16:20

杨春宝一级律师简介

杨春宝一级律师,大成上海高级合伙人、资本市场部主任、国资基金研究中心主任,大成中国区私募基金专业带头人、科技与文化法律研究中心联合牵头人。执业30余年,长期从事私募基金、投融资、并购重组法律服务,尤其对对赌研究颇深且具有非常丰富的实战经验,并专注于金融机构股权投资业务。2004年起多次入选The Legal 500"私募基金"和"公司与商业"等境内外各类律师榜单,代理的中国法院首例适用外国法律审理外国公司的董事损害小股东权益纠纷案入选上海高院发布的《上海法院域外法查明典型案例》和威科先行"要案头条"。入选上海涉外法律人才库、上海市司法局鼎新法治人才库、上海国有企业改制法律顾问团,具有上市公司独立董事任职资格,系多家知名高校的兼职教授或兼职研究生导师及上海市商务委跨国经营人才培训班讲师。出版《私募股权投资基金风险防控操作实务》等16本投融资法律专著。了解更多

常见法律问题

仲裁庭如何认定商标转让申请被接受的时间?

仲裁庭认为WIPO接受商标转让申请即视为美国专利商标局已接受,因WIPO作为国际局接受申请后,美国机构后续程序不影响合同约定的接受时间。

本案适用范围是什么?

适用于涉及国际商标转让与股权转让挂钩的争议,特别是依据《马德里议定书》进行国际商标注册转让的情形。

常见误解:是否必须等美国机构书面确认才算接受?

不是。根据本案仲裁裁决,WIPO对申请的接受即满足合同约定的「接受」条件,无需等待美国机构后续确认通知。

以上内容仅供参考,不构成法律意见。如需专业法律服务,请联系杨春宝一级律师:chambers.yang@dentons.cn

  • 本站声明:本站所载之法律论文、法律评论、案例、法律咨询等,除非另有注明,著作权人均为站长杨春宝高级律师本人。欢迎其他网站链接,但是,未经书面许可,不得擅自摘编、转载。引用及经许可转载时均应注明作者和出处"法律桥",并链接本站。本站网址:https://law-bridge.com/。
  •  
  •         本站所有内容(包括法律咨询、法律法规)仅供参考,不构成法律意见,本站不对资料的完整性和时效性负责。您在处理具体法律事务时,请洽询有资质的律师。本站将努力为广大网友提供更好的服务,但不对本站提供的任何免费服务作出正式的承诺。本站所载投稿文章,其言论不代表本站观点,如需使用,请与原作者联系,版权归原作者所有。

发表回复